A UFLPA detention: the 30-day clock, the two reviews, and which other entries share the risk

Published · Updated

Short answer

After a UFLPA detention, CBP's current operational guidance gives the importer 30 days, counted from the date the goods were presented for examination and so partly gone before the detention notice arrives, to export or destroy them or to ask for an applicability review (no Xinjiang or Entity List input) or an exception (clear and convincing evidence that no forced labor was used). The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (Public Law 117-78) makes CBP presume, for goods imported from June 21, 2022, that anything made wholly or in part in Xinjiang or by an entity on the UFLPA Entity List was made with forced labor and is barred under 19 U.S.C. 1307. Up to two extensions can stretch the 30 days to 90 days from the notice; with no action, the goods are excluded, and the importer then has 180 days to export, destroy or protest. Use the same days to find every past and pending entry that shares the supplier, the inputs and the HTS lines.

TariffSense checks every line of your filed entries against the measures in force on the entry date.

What does a UFLPA detention mean?

Section 3 of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, signed on December 23, 2021, tells the CBP Commissioner to presume that goods mined, produced or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, or produced by an entity on the lists the Act requires, are prohibited under 19 U.S.C. 1307 and not entitled to entry. Section 3(e) made the presumption effective 180 days after enactment, and CBP's UFLPA FAQ gives the start date as goods imported on or after June 21, 2022. Section 1307 itself bars goods made wholly or in part by forced, convict or indentured labor, including forced child labor.

The lists are combined in the UFLPA Entity List, which the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force publishes on the DHS website. Each entity carries its own effective date, the earliest June 21, 2022, so the list on the date of entry is the one that counts. The Act requires the enforcement strategy's list of high-priority sectors to include cotton, tomatoes and polysilicon (section 2(d)(2)(B)(viii)). The Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force has widened it since. Its strategy of June 17, 2022 named apparel, cotton and cotton products, silica-based products including polysilicon, and tomatoes and downstream products; its July 9, 2024 update added aluminum, polyvinyl chloride and seafood; and its August 19, 2025 update added caustic soda, copper, jujubes (red dates), lithium and steel. Those are the strategy updates DHS lists as of November 10, 2026. CBP's guidance gives sector-by-sector tracing documentation for all twelve in its Appendix A.

A UFLPA detention is an admissibility decision, not a duty. No rate is charged on the goods because of the UFLPA; the question is whether they can enter at all. Duty measures aimed at forced labor are a separate matter and are not covered on this page.

CBP's guidance (CBP Publication 5560-0526, the version CBP posted on its website on June 12, 2026), which supersedes its June 13, 2022 UFLPA guidance, sorts shipments into two paths:

  • Potential input: information indicates the goods may contain an input from Xinjiang or a listed entity. CBP detains them and the importer can respond.
  • Direct input: information indicates the goods do contain such an input. CBP excludes them straight away, and the response starts at the exclusion.

What is the clock after a detention notice?

CBP detains UFLPA shipments under its ordinary examination authority, 19 U.S.C. 1499 and 19 CFR 151.16, according to its FAQ. The clocks do not all start on the same day, which is the point most often missed. Grouped by the day each one counts from:

Counts fromWhat must happenHow longRule
Presentation of the goods for examinationCBP releases or detains5 business days19 U.S.C. 1499(c)(1); 19 CFR 151.16(b)
PresentationImporter exports or destroys, or asks for an applicability or exception review, by email to the contact on the noticeBefore the initial 30-day detention period endsCBP guidance, steps 2A, 3A and 4A
PresentationIf the importer does nothing, the goods are deemed excluded and an exclusion notice issues30 daysCBP guidance, step 4A
PresentationCBP's own admissibility decision; a failure to decide is treated as a protestable exclusion30 days, or longer if the law allows1499(c)(5)(A); 151.16(e) and (f)
CBP's decision to detainNotice of detention (CBP Form 6051D with the UFLPA attachment)5 business days1499(c)(2); 151.16(c)
The detention noticeUp to two extensions to assemble the review packageNo more than 90 calendar days in totalCBP guidance
An exception grantedReport to Congress identifying the good and the evidence30 daysUFLPA section 3(c)
The exclusion, whether direct or after a denied reviewExport or destroy, or protest under 19 U.S.C. 1514 in the ACE Protest Module180 daysCBP guidance, steps 3D, 3E, 5A and 6A
Filing of a protest of an exclusionIf CBP has not decided it, the protest is treated as deniedOn the 30th day1499(c)(5)(B); 151.16(g)
Denial of the protestExport or destroy, or sue at the Court of International Trade180 daysCBP guidance, steps 6C and 6D

Two costs run from day one. CBP's guidance makes the importer responsible for storage throughout any review, and says CBP may require a single transaction bond of three times the value of the detained goods when forced labor is suspected. Plan for both in the decision on whether to fight for a shipment or export it.

The notice itself must give the date the goods were presented for examination, the reason for the detention, the expected length, the tests or inquiries planned, and what information would speed things up (151.16(c)). Write the presentation date down. Because CBP has up to five business days to decide and five more to send the notice, part of the first 30 days can be gone before the notice reaches you; ask for an extension early rather than on day 29.

Which route out fits your shipment?

There are four ways a detained shipment leaves CBP's hands, and the choice depends on what your supply chain records can prove.

RouteWhen it fitsWhat it takesWho decides
Export or destroyThe records will not support either review in time, or the goods are worth less than the fightNotice to the point of contact on the detention notice; all costs on the importerImporter's decision
Applicability reviewNo input from Xinjiang or a listed entity, at any tierSupply chain tracing from raw material to the imported goods, with business records in English translationThe importer's Center of Excellence and Expertise
ExceptionAn input did come from Xinjiang or a listed entity, but no forced labor was usedFull compliance with the strategy's importer guidance, complete answers to every CBP inquiry, and clear and convincing evidenceCBP's Forced Labor Division; reported to Congress
Protest after exclusionThe goods were excluded, directly or after a denied reviewA protest under 19 U.S.C. 1514 in the ACE Protest Module within 180 days, choosing the applicability or exception review as the secondary issueCBP, then the Court of International Trade

Most importers who contest a detention ask for an applicability review. CBP's guidance says the package should document the order, purchase, manufacture and transport of every input, and its sample list includes invoices, purchase orders, production contracts, work orders, bills of lading, foreign customs clearance, transportation records, manifests, proof of payment and certificates of origin, with an executive summary. It says affidavits, redacted documents and untranslated documents are not sufficient on their own. CBP's FAQ adds that laboratory tests, such as isotopic testing of cotton, are considered as part of the package, from samples taken under a manipulation request with a secure chain of custody.

The exception is a much harder standard. The Act requires clear and convincing evidence, which CBP's FAQ describes as a higher standard than a preponderance of the evidence. Each exception CBP grants is reported to Congress within 30 days, identifying the good and the evidence considered (UFLPA section 3(c)).

Which past and pending entries share the risk?

A detention tells you CBP has information linking a supplier, a producer or an input to Xinjiang or a listed entity. That information does not stop at one container. The days after the notice are the time to find every other entry that rests on the same facts, using your own entry export.

  1. Match on the manufacturer. Pull every entry line with the same manufacturer identification code in block 13 of the entry summary, and the same manufacturer name and address under other codes. CBP's FAQ says that since March 18, 2023 ACE requires a valid Chinese postal code for the manufacturer on cargo release when the country is China, and warns when the code is in Xinjiang, so the postal codes on your own filings are a first screen.
  2. Match on the supplier and the inputs. Add entries from the same seller or trading company, and entries of other finished goods that use the same raw material or component from the same upstream producer. The detention package you are building lists those producers; reuse it as the search list.
  3. Match on HTS lines in the priority sectors. Flag every line in the sectors the Act and CBP's guidance name, from any supplier, where the upstream producers have not been traced.
  4. Check the Entity List by date. For each upstream producer, check the DHS list and the effective date of any listing against the dates of your entries.
  5. Sort the matches by status:
Status of the matching entryWhat can happenWhat to do now
Not yet shipped or in transitLikely detention on arrivalHold or re-source, or prepare the tracing package before arrival
Arrived, not yet releasedDetentionSame package; tell the Center the supply chain matches one already under review
Released recentlyRedelivery demand, and liquidated damages of three times the entered value if not redelivered (CBP guidance; 19 CFR 113.62(n)(1))Keep the goods traceable until the redelivery window has passed
Released and soldNo goods left to detainDecide with counsel whether a prior disclosure is warranted

CBP's FAQ says that when a shipment comes from a supply chain identical to one CBP has already reviewed and cleared, a summary tracing report with the producers for every stage and a business record for each has brought average detentions down to 10 to 14 days. So a cleared package is worth keeping and indexing by supplier, for every future shipment.

If the search finds forced-labor inputs in goods already entered, CBP's guidance points to a prior disclosure made to the Center for your industry or to the Forced Labor Division before CBP discovers the issue. That is a filing for trade counsel. This page describes the procedure and is not legal advice.

What does the review package look like in practice?

CBP's best-practice material, summarized in its FAQ, comes down to preparation before any detention:

  1. Have a response plan, with suppliers who know the UFLPA and documents ready to send.
  2. Agree how suppliers will share sensitive records. CBP's FAQ says a seller or exporter can send documents directly to CBP, provided the importer is told.
  3. Talk to the Center early about high-risk imports, before they arrive.
  4. Send a complete, organized package with English translations, and a supplier list that shows each supplier's role in production.
  5. Answer CBP's follow-up questions quickly and fully. For an exception, completeness is a legal condition, not a courtesy (UFLPA section 3(b)(1)(B)).

Where does TariffSense fit?

The search in the previous section runs on entry data you already hold: manufacturer, supplier, origin, HTS number, entry date and status on every line. TariffSense reads Form 7501s and broker entry exports in any layout into those fields, and the post-entry audit page shows what comes back. The tracing evidence, and every decision on the detention, stays with your compliance team, your broker and counsel.

What should you do next on your own entries?

Before any detention, list your top suppliers of goods in the priority sectors and write down, for each, the producer at every stage back to the raw material, with one business record per stage. Where you cannot fill a stage in, that is the supply chain most likely to be detained and least ready to be released. The country of origin guide covers how origin is decided for other purposes, how to file a customs protest covers the protest after an exclusion, and the post-entry audit pillar covers the rest of the line checks.

Sources

  1. Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, Public Law 117-78, 135 Stat. 1525 (December 23, 2021) (govinfo.gov, checked )
  2. 19 U.S.C. 1307 Convict-made goods; importation prohibited (govinfo.gov, checked )
  3. 19 U.S.C. 1499 Examination of merchandise (subsection (c), detentions) (govinfo.gov, checked )
  4. 19 CFR 151.16 Detention of merchandise (ecfr.gov, checked )
  5. 19 CFR 12.42 Findings of Commissioner of CBP (forced labor; withhold release orders) (ecfr.gov, checked )
  6. 19 CFR 12.43 Proof of admissibility (ecfr.gov, checked )
  7. 19 CFR 113.62 Basic importation and entry bond conditions (ecfr.gov, checked )
  8. CBP, Forced Labor Enforcement Operational Guidance for Importers (CBP Publication 5560-0526) (cbp.gov, checked )
  9. CBP, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (cbp.gov, checked )
  10. CBP, FAQs: Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Enforcement (cbp.gov, checked )
  11. DHS, UFLPA Strategy and its 2023, 2024 and 2025 updates (high-priority sectors) (dhs.gov, checked )
  12. DHS, UFLPA Entity List (dhs.gov, checked )
  • Updated : Short answer reordered so its first sentence carries the deciding deadline. No new facts.
  • Updated : Re-checked every source; rates, caps and deadlines updated.

Questions people ask

Neither. It is an admissibility decision: CBP's guidance says a detention notice is CBP's decision to subject the goods to further inspection, and an exclusion keeps them out of the United States. No duty is assessed on the detained goods because of the UFLPA. The money at stake is the value of the goods, storage, any bond CBP requires and, for goods already released, redelivery and liquidated damages.

An applicability review argues the presumption does not apply because the goods and their inputs were not made in Xinjiang or by a listed entity; CBP's guidance says it needs supply chain tracing from raw material to the imported goods, and it is handled by the importer's Center of Excellence and Expertise. An exception accepts the Xinjiang or Entity List link and argues, under section 3(b) of the UFLPA, that the importer fully complied with the strategy's guidance, answered every CBP inquiry completely, and shows by clear and convincing evidence that no forced labor was used. Exceptions are handled by CBP's Forced Labor Division, and each one granted is reported to Congress within 30 days with the good and the evidence identified.

Yes, according to CBP's UFLPA FAQ: goods made with any input from Xinjiang are presumed to be made with forced labor, even a small component from a third- or fourth-tier supplier. The statute's words are 'wholly or in part'.

Yes, for a detention. CBP's guidance allows up to two extensions, not exceeding 90 calendar days in total from the date of the detention notice, at the discretion of the Forced Labor Division, port or Center director. Ask the port before you submit the review package, and the assigned Center after. Ask before the initial 30 days end. CBP's guidance lists no extension for the 180-day periods after an exclusion.

A withhold release order is issued under 19 U.S.C. 1307 and 19 CFR 12.42(e) after CBP investigates a specific product or producer, anywhere in the world, and the importer has three months from importation to prove admissibility under 19 CFR 12.43. The UFLPA applies a statutory presumption to Xinjiang and Entity List goods with no product-specific investigation, and CBP's FAQ says XUAR-related orders in force before June 21, 2022 were subsumed under it. CBP detains UFLPA goods under its ordinary examination authority, 19 U.S.C. 1499 and 19 CFR part 151.

CBP's guidance points to two things. A prior disclosure under 19 U.S.C. 1592, made to the Center for your industry or to the Forced Labor Division, before CBP discovers the issue. And redelivery: CBP can demand the goods back, and failure to redeliver can lead to liquidated damages of three times the entered value under 19 CFR 113.62. Involve trade counsel before you file anything.

Bring your last month of entries.

We'll run them live on the demo.